WTC7 collapse reported 20 minutes BEFORE it happened!! WTF?

	Duration: 10:43 minutes Upload Time: 07-02-27 08:46:33 User: xtraa :::: Favorites
Description: This footage is to document that BBC News recieved a press release about the WTC7's (Salomon Brothers Building) collapse more than 20 minutes before it happened. I screw the first half, to match YouTubes 10 minutes maximum video length. However, the rest is uncutted. You can see the building is still there - untouched in the background. No dope. Five minutes before it collapsed the live-transmision aborts. Let me ask all the people who actually call all this shit a conspiracy theory. I am waiting for some good explanations. The video was deleted quickly from the web archieve as it seems, but you can still view the uncut full length version at http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=49f_1172526096 where I captured it from.
Comments
tuberrifico ::: Favorites I agree completely Chicken Little.Where do we hide? 07-07-06 18:41:24 _____________________________________________________
tuberrifico ::: Favorites Grammar errors destroy your credibility.Now go brush yer tooth. 07-06-24 07:53:32 _____________________________________________________
jahbulonrothschild ::: Favorites Get a real reason to not believe someone, like if theigh r lieing or sumtheengh. Not only had a steel structure never collapsed due to fire, neither had a building and all it's contents turned to dust from "collapsing". Denial doesn't really help your false sense of security. Keep studying and you will find the truth, it IS HERE. 07-07-05 12:09:16 _____________________________________________________
brtndr98 ::: Favorites LOL!! Houston we have a problem!...The building that has supposed to of collapsed is still standing. Response: Ok, knock out the satellite feed, and go to camera one! 07-06-16 05:03:48 _____________________________________________________
pav22967 ::: Favorites may be your watch was wrong...... or your tele is impressive with giving you the news before it happens!!!!!! lol 07-06-16 02:02:05 _____________________________________________________
ingostorm ::: Favorites O yes, it's definitively a NOT-LIFE recording, what run behind of her. The simple have not got the actual picture so fast.. 07-05-27 13:04:32 _____________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________
ingostorm ::: Favorites (1) it looks like the interview is recorded later and make with voice over on the picture. (2) The voice over and image are not match. (3) Behind of reporter (lady) is a video, it's looks like not life. May be they have not so fast the picture. (4) But I agree to ask your GOV is patriotic! And even necessary! I also believe it's a lot of people in the GOV who wanna u ask them. 07-05-27 13:00:34 _____________________________________________________
sirstabulous ::: Favorites Thanks for the video.Fuck all the naysayers we want answers! you get 5 stars from SirStabulous. 07-05-17 15:48:10 _____________________________________________________
mrfinke ::: Favorites ok, one video description claims it collapsed at 4:10 or something and than another video description on youtube said it was 5:20. They could have made a mistake. Gosh, reporters are humans too you know. On one CNN video I saw it said they thought wtc 7 had/was collapsing, but than their text on the screen said it was on fire and MAY collapse. So because someone predicts something that makes it a conspiracy? 07-03-07 18:11:42 _____________________________________________________
911HijackerDotCom ::: Favorites It's not a green scene. It's been verified by BBC. Another BBC affiliate reported the same thing. CNN reported it collapsed at least 45 minutes earlier than it did as well. BBC now claims they "lost" their 9/11 tapes. Something fishy. 07-02-28 17:45:26 _____________________________________________________
Empires91 ::: Favorites is the "salorman's building" the wtc7? in any case, don't the major news guys use green screens of pre-recorded scenery for their backgrounds(couple times off?) in any case, good evidence. 07-02-27 23:54:44 _____________________________________________________
labsub ::: Favorites Because, it's not the american government anymore silly! They showed cheesy fake video for all the "educated americans" to see while bin laden was really denying it all and blaming mossad, cia, ect, in arabic on Aljazera t.v. 07-02-27 20:50:58 _____________________________________________________
khanezflouss ::: Favorites thanks to you, I don't really have an answer to your question because I am still confused or maybe I am a big retard as you claimed. my question to you is that why would the american government do this and for what purposes. also didn't ben laden claimed responsibility for the 9/11 attacks? I wish someone can answer my two questions. 07-02-27 20:08:46 _____________________________________________________
pav22967 ::: Favorites 1 to kick start the ecconomy & they were apart of your financail institution & 2 any one that wants to be heard like bin larden would claim responsibility to put fear in poeple, like a true terrorist, he gets your ATTENTION.... 07-06-16 02:00:55 _____________________________________________________
xtraa ::: Favorites Hey. I am waiting for some serious explanations. A press release before the crash accidentally was given to BBC News. They did not knew all the names of the buildings, otherwise they would have been confused. End of the conspiracy theory. I think one has to be a big retard to still believe in some mullahs with knifes , now. :) 07-02-27 09:33:51 _____________________________________________________